手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| パンデミック疲労尺度(Pandemic Fatigue Scale, PFS)× | 健康保護行動尺度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 公衆衛生学 | 公衆衛生学 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2020 | 2011 |
| 提唱者≠ | Restrepo et al. | Bish & Michie |
| 種類 | Self-report | Self-report |
| 原典≠ | Restrepo, A., Pfeil, J., & Farias, M. (2021). Pandemic fatigue and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a representative US sample. Nature Medicine, 27(6), 1093–1101. link ↗ | Bish, A., & Michie, S. (2010). Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(4), 797–824. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | PFS, COVID Fatigue Scale | HPBS, Protective Behavior Scale |
| 関連 | 3 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | The Pandemic Fatigue Scale (PFS) measures psychological exhaustion and reduced motivation to maintain protective behaviors during prolonged pandemics. Developed by Restrepo and colleagues, it captures the phenomenon whereby individuals progressively abandon preventive measures (distancing, mask-wearing, testing) despite ongoing transmission risk, driven by 'fatigue' or loss of motivation rather than reduced threat perception. The PFS has become essential for monitoring behavioral adherence trends and explaining divergence between risk and protective behavior during multi-wave pandemics. | The Health Protective Behavior Scale (HPBS) assesses self-reported engagement in preventive behaviors during infectious disease outbreaks, including hand hygiene, respiratory etiquette, isolation, and vaccination. Developed from literature review and behavioral theory by Bish and Michie, and refined through implementation research by Conner and colleagues, it measures adherence to public health guidance. The HPBS is widely used in pandemic surveillance research and behavioral intervention trials to track population adoption of protective measures. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|