手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| P-AROMANのプリトジェニック拡張× | 基準相互相関による基準重要度 (CRITIC)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 意思決定 | 意思決定 |
| 系統 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 提唱年≠ | 2023 | 1995 |
| 提唱者≠ | Bošković et al. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| 種類≠ | Plithogenic outranking/ranking — Plithogenic Set (PltS: attribute values with contradiction degrees) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| 原典≠ | Bošković et al. (2023). Plithogenic Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for two-step Normalization. Plithogenic Logic and Computation link ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | — | — |
| 関連 | 8 | 8 |
| 概要≠ | P-AROMAN (Plithogenic extension of P-AROMAN) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković et al. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|