ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

順序尺度 nomological validity×確認的因子分析(CFA)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1955 (concept); ordinal application 1990s–present1969
提唱者Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); ordinal extension in modern psychometricsKarl Gustav Jöreskog
種類Validity assessmentHypothesis-testing latent variable model
原典Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
別名nomological validity for ordinal data, ordinal nomological network, construct network validity (ordinal), ordinal criterion-related validityCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
関連54
概要Ordinal nomological validity examines whether a construct measured with ordinal items (e.g., Likert-type scales) behaves in theoretically predicted ways within a nomological network — a web of expected relationships with other constructs and criteria — using methods suited to ordinal data rather than assuming continuous measurement.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Ordinal Nomological Validity · Confirmatory factor analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare