手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 順序尺度測定不変性テスト× | 確認的因子分析(CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1984–2011 | 1969 |
| 提唱者≠ | Roger Millsap; Bengt Muthén | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| 種類≠ | Multi-group model comparison | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| 原典≠ | Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728936 | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | ordinal MI, measurement invariance for ordinal data, ordinal CFA invariance, categorical measurement invariance | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Ordinal measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a multi-group confirmatory factor model holds equivalent measurement properties across groups when scale items are ordinal — such as Likert-type response scales. It uses polychoric correlations and categorical estimators (WLSMV/DWLS) rather than Pearson-based methods, correcting the systematic bias that arises when ordinal data are treated as continuous. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|