手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| Oral History Method× | 現象学× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | フィールド調査法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s | Early 20th century (Husserl ~1900–1913; Heidegger ~1927) |
| 提唱者≠ | Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie | Edmund Husserl (transcendental); Martin Heidegger (hermeneutic) |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative historical-empirical method | Qualitative research approach |
| 原典≠ | Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960 | Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803957466 |
| 別名≠ | oral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM | Fenomenoloji, phenomenological inquiry, phenomenological analysis |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people. | Phenomenology is a qualitative research approach that investigates how participants live through and make sense of a specific experience. Rooted in the philosophy of Edmund Husserl and extended by Martin Heidegger, it aims to reveal the essential structures of lived experience rather than to measure or predict outcomes. The two most widely applied variants are Husserl's transcendental phenomenology, which seeks universal essences, and Heidegger's hermeneutic phenomenology, which emphasises interpretation within context. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|