ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

客観的基準重み決定の新手法×組み合わせ距離に基づく評価×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20172016
提唱者Bulut, E.Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.
種類Weight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)Distance from anti-ideal (Euclidean + Taxicab)
原典Bulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. (2016). A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research link ↗
別名
関連88
概要NMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CODAS (Combinative Distance-Based Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: NMD · CODAS. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare