手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 客観的基準重み決定の新手法× | 加法比率評価× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 意思決定 | 意思決定 |
| 系統 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 提唱年≠ | 2017 | 2010 |
| 提唱者≠ | Bulut, E. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| 種類≠ | Weight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based) | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| 原典≠ | Bulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| 別名 | — | — |
| 関連 | 8 | 8 |
| 概要≠ | NMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|