ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

客観的基準重み決定の新手法×自動ペアワイズ線形順序結合×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20172020
提唱者Bulut, E.Konstantinos, N., Xenakis, A., Kehagias, A.
種類Weight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)Pairwise dominance aggregation (automatic combination)
原典Bulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗Konstantinos, N., Xenakis, A., Kehagias, A. (2020). APLOCO: A linear programming-based multicriteria ranking method that handles dependent criteria and criteria groups. Operational Research link ↗
別名
関連88
概要NMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.APLOCO (Automatic Pairwise Linear Order Combination) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Konstantinos, N., Xenakis, A., Kehagias, A. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: NMD · APLOCO. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare