ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

ネットワークベースのマッピングレビュー×書誌カップリング分析×
分野科学計量学計量書誌学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年2000s–2010s1963
提唱者Petticrew & Roberts (mapping review); network overlay adopted from bibliometric network analysis traditionMelvin M. Kessler
種類Evidence synthesis method with network analysis overlayMethod
原典Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN: 978-1405121101Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(3), 123–131. DOI ↗
別名network mapping review, citation-network mapping review, network-enhanced evidence mapping, network-informed mapping reviewdocument coupling, bibliographic similarity
関連65
概要A network-based mapping review combines the breadth of a traditional evidence mapping exercise with bibliometric network analysis to chart the structural landscape of a research field. Rather than simply cataloguing studies by topic, this approach constructs citation, co-authorship, or co-word networks to reveal clusters of intellectual activity, influential works, and collaboration patterns — producing both a visual and a descriptive map of the evidence base.Bibliographic coupling is a method that identifies intellectual relationships between documents by measuring their shared references. Two papers are considered 'coupled' when they cite the same sources, indicating they address related research questions or draw from the same conceptual foundations. Introduced by Kessler in 1963, this approach enables researchers to map knowledge domains and discover thematically similar publications without relying on subject cataloging or keywords.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Network-based Mapping review · Bibliographic Coupling. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare