ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Natural Experiment in Politics×Field Experiment in Politics×
分野Political SciencePolitical Science
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年20122000
提唱者Dunning (design-based framework); Lee (close-election RD lineage)Gerber & Green (modern political field experiments)
種類Observational study exploiting as-if random assignmentRandomized experiment conducted in a real political setting
原典Dunning, T. (2012). Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781107698000Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 653–663. DOI ↗
別名Political natural experiment, As-if random design, Design-based natural experiment, Quasi-experiment with as-if randomizationPolitical field experiment, Get-out-the-vote experiment, GOTV experiment, Voter mobilization experiment
関連44
概要A natural experiment in political science exploits a naturally occurring source of as-if random assignment — close elections, lotteries, arbitrary boundaries, or policy thresholds — to identify causal effects without the researcher manipulating anything. Codified for the social sciences by Thad Dunning's 2012 design-based treatment and exemplified by David Lee's close-election regression-discontinuity analysis of U.S. House races, the approach treats nature, institutions, or chance as if they had run an experiment, recovering credible causal estimates from observational data when randomization is impossible.A field experiment in political science randomizes a real intervention — such as a get-out-the-vote canvass, mailing, or phone call — among genuine political actors in their natural environment and compares behavioral outcomes like validated turnout. Revived for the discipline by Gerber and Green's 2000 voter-mobilization study and codified in their 2012 textbook, the approach combines the causal leverage of randomization with the realism of consequential, real-world settings, while carefully distinguishing the effect of being assigned a treatment from the effect of actually receiving it.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Natural Experiment in Politics · Field Experiment in Politics. 2026-06-25に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare