ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

TODIMのニュートロソフィー拡張×基準相互相関による基準重要度 (CRITIC)×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20181995
提唱者Ji, P., Zhang, H. Y., Wang, J. Q.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
種類Neutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
原典Ji, P., Zhang, H. Y., Wang, J. Q. (2018). A projection-based TODIM method under multi-valued neutrosophic environments and its application in personnel selection. Neural Computing and Applications DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
別名
関連88
概要N-TODIM (Neutrosophic extension of TODIM) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ji, P., Zhang, H. Y., Wang, J. Q. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: N-TODIM · CRITIC. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare