手法を比較

	COPRAS-IN	階層分析法	複合比例評価法
分野	意思決定	意思決定	意思決定
系統	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
提唱年	2019	1980	1996
提唱者	Şahin, R.	Saaty, T. L.	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.
種類	Interval Neutrosophic ranking — INN: <[T_L,T_U],[I_L,I_U],[F_L,F_U]> with 0 ≤ T_U+I_U+F_U ≤ 3	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)
原典	Şahin, R. (2019). COPRAS Method with Neutrosophic Sets. Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Using Neutrosophic Sets, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 369, Springer, Cham	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65
別名	—	—	—
関連	7	8	8
概要	N-COPRAS (COPRAS-IN — COPRAS with Interval Neutrosophic Numbers (INN)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Şahin, R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.