手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 複数事例に基づく内省的テーマ分析× | ケーススタディリサーチ（Case Study Research）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2006 (RTA origins); 2010s onward (combined application) | 1984 (seminal codification) |
| 提唱者≠ | Braun & Clarke (reflexive thematic analysis); Yin (multiple case study framework) | Robert K. Yin (systematised in Case Study Research, 1984) |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative research design and analysis approach | Qualitative research design |
| 原典≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 978-1473953246 | Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 別名≠ | MC-RTA, multi-case reflexive thematic analysis, cross-case reflexive thematic analysis, multiple case RTA | Vaka Çalışması (Case Study), case study design, case study methodology |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | Multiple case-based reflexive thematic analysis integrates Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) with a multiple case study framework. Qualitative data are collected from two or more bounded cases, RTA is applied within each case to generate case-specific themes, and the themes are then compared and synthesised across cases. The approach preserves the depth and interpretive richness of RTA while enabling cross-case pattern recognition that single-case designs cannot provide. | Case study research is a qualitative research design that investigates a specific phenomenon, individual, group, organisation, or event in depth within its real-world context. Systematised by Robert K. Yin in 1984, it supports single-case and multiple-case designs and draws on multiple data sources — interviews, observation, documents, and artefacts — to build a rich, contextualised account of a bounded unit. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|