手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 複数事例に基づく物語研究× | 比較事例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2000s (synthesis of Clandinin & Connelly 2000 with multiple case study design) | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 提唱者≠ | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); Robert K. Yin (multiple case logic) | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 原典≠ | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 別名 | multi-case narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, comparative narrative inquiry, multi-site narrative inquiry | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Multiple case-based narrative inquiry is a qualitative research design that applies narrative inquiry — the study of human experience through story — across two or more purposively selected cases. Each case is treated as a bounded narrative unit, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case comparison. The approach draws on Clandinin and Connelly's narrative inquiry tradition while adopting the replication logic of multiple case design to build richer, more transferable understandings of how people narrate and make meaning of their experiences. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|