手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 複数事例基盤の比喩分析× | コンテンツ分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1980s–2000s (synthesis emerged in qualitative case research) | Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018 |
| 提唱者≠ | Building on Lakoff & Johnson (1980) conceptual metaphor theory and Yin's multiple-case logic | Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative comparative design | Qualitative / mixed-method research technique |
| 原典≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661 |
| 別名≠ | cross-case metaphor analysis, comparative metaphor analysis, multi-case metaphor study, MCBMA | İçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | Multiple case-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative comparative method that systematically identifies and interprets metaphorical language across two or more bounded cases — such as schools, organisations, or participant groups — to reveal how people in different contexts conceptualise a shared phenomenon. It integrates Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory with Yin's multiple-case logic, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case breadth. | Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|