手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 複数の事例に基づく解釈現象学分析× | 比較事例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1996 (IPA); multi-case design consolidated circa 2009 | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 提唱者≠ | Jonathan A. Smith (IPA); multi-case extension elaborated by Smith, Flowers & Larkin | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative interpretive research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 原典≠ | Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 別名 | multi-case IPA, multiple-case IPA, cross-case interpretive phenomenological analysis, IPA multiple case design | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Multiple case-based interpretive phenomenological analysis (multi-case IPA) applies the close, idiographic reading of IPA to a set of purposively selected cases, conducting detailed within-case analysis before systematically comparing themes across cases. The approach retains IPA's commitment to understanding individual lived experience in depth while allowing the researcher to identify convergent and divergent patterns across structurally similar situations or participant groups. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|