手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 複数事例に基づく解釈学的現象学× | Thematic Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 質的手法 | 質的研究 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1990s–2000s (synthesis of traditions) | 2006 |
| 提唱者≠ | Max van Manen (hermeneutic phenomenology); Robert Yin (multiple-case logic) | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative research design | Method |
| 原典≠ | van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | multi-case hermeneutic phenomenology, cross-case hermeneutic phenomenology, interpretive multi-case phenomenology, MCBHP | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Multiple case-based hermeneutic phenomenology combines the interpretive depth of van Manen's hermeneutic phenomenology with the structured cross-case logic of multiple-case study design. Each case — a bounded individual, group, or site — is analysed for the lived meaning of a shared phenomenon; findings are then compared across cases to reveal both unique contextual textures and common hermeneutic themes. The approach is favoured when context shapes experience in ways that a single case cannot fully illuminate. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|