ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

複数事例に基づく解釈学的現象学×ナラティブ・インクワイアリー×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1990s–2000s (synthesis of traditions)2000
提唱者Max van Manen (hermeneutic phenomenology); Robert Yin (multiple-case logic)D. Jean Clandinin and F. Michael Connelly
種類Qualitative research designMethod
原典van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. link ↗
別名multi-case hermeneutic phenomenology, cross-case hermeneutic phenomenology, interpretive multi-case phenomenology, MCBHPNarrative Analysis, Narrative Research, Life Story Method
関連53
概要Multiple case-based hermeneutic phenomenology combines the interpretive depth of van Manen's hermeneutic phenomenology with the structured cross-case logic of multiple-case study design. Each case — a bounded individual, group, or site — is analysed for the lived meaning of a shared phenomenon; findings are then compared across cases to reveal both unique contextual textures and common hermeneutic themes. The approach is favoured when context shapes experience in ways that a single case cannot fully illuminate.Narrative inquiry is a qualitative research methodology that treats stories and life narratives as primary data, analyzing how individuals construct meaning and identity through storytelling. Developed by D. Jean Clandinin and F. Michael Connelly (2000), narrative inquiry examines the narratives people tell about their lives, experiences, and transitions, understanding that people make sense of experience through narrative.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multiple Case-Based Hermeneutic Phenomenology · Narrative Inquiry. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare