ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

複数事例に基づくグラウンデッド・セオリー×Thematic Analysis×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1980s–1990s (integrative development)2006
提唱者Synthesised from Kathleen Eisenhardt (multiple-case logic) and Barney Glaser & Anselm Strauss (grounded theory)Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
種類Qualitative research design combining case study and grounded theoryMethod
原典Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. DOI ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
別名multi-case grounded theory, MCGT, comparative case grounded theory, cross-case grounded theoryTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
関連63
概要Multiple case-based grounded theory is a qualitative research design that embeds grounded theory's inductive coding logic inside a structured multiple-case framework. Rather than generating theory from a single site or interview pool, researchers iteratively collect and analyze data across two or more purposefully selected cases, using constant comparison both within and across cases until theoretical saturation is reached. The result is a substantive theory grounded in rich, cross-site empirical evidence.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multiple Case-Based Grounded Theory · Thematic Analysis. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare