ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

多レベル再検査信頼性×確認的因子分析(CFA)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1979 (ICC foundation); multilevel extension: 1990s–2000s1969
提唱者Shrout & Fleiss (ICC foundation); multilevel extension by Goldstein, Snijders, and othersKarl Gustav Jöreskog
種類Reliability estimation under hierarchical dataHypothesis-testing latent variable model
原典Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
別名hierarchical test-retest reliability, multilevel ICC reliability, nested test-retest reliability, ML-TRT reliabilityCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
関連54
概要Multilevel test-retest reliability estimates how consistently a measurement instrument produces the same scores across repeated administrations when observations are nested within higher-level units — such as patients within clinics or students within classrooms. It partitions total score variance across levels using intraclass correlation coefficients derived from multilevel models.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multilevel Test-Retest Reliability · Confirmatory factor analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare