ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Multilevel Regression and Poststratification×動的パネルデータモデル×
分野Political Science計量経済学
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年20041988–1991
提唱者Gelman and Little (method); Park, Gelman & Bafumi (state-level application)Arellano & Bond (1991); Holtz-Eakin, Newey & Rosen (1988)
種類Survey small-area estimation model combining multilevel regression with census poststratificationDynamic regression / GMM estimation
原典Park, D. K., Gelman, A., & Bafumi, J. (2004). Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls. Political Analysis, 12(4), 375–385. DOI ↗Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. DOI ↗
別名MRP, Mister P, Multilevel regression with poststratification, Small-area opinion estimationdynamic panel model, panel data model with lagged dependent variable, DPD model, Arellano-Bond model
関連55
概要Multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) estimates opinion or behavior in small subpopulations — states, districts, demographic groups — from a single national survey that is far too small to support direct estimates in each unit. It first fits a multilevel model that predicts the outcome from individual demographic and geographic characteristics, borrowing strength across units through partial pooling, and then poststratifies the predicted values to known population counts of demographic-by-geographic cells. Introduced for state-level opinion by Park, Gelman, and Bafumi (2004) and shown by Lax and Phillips (2009) to outperform disaggregation, MRP has become the standard tool for subnational opinion estimation.The dynamic panel data model extends standard panel regression by including a lagged value of the outcome variable as a regressor, capturing persistence and adjustment dynamics. Because the lagged dependent variable is correlated with the unit-specific fixed effect, ordinary OLS or within estimators are biased; GMM-based methods using internal instruments are the standard remedy.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multilevel Regression and Poststratification · Dynamic Panel Data Model. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare