ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

多層的測度效度×収束的妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年20051959
提唱者Chen, Bliese & Mathieu (building on Cronbach & Meehl)Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
種類Validity assessment / construct validationValidity evidence / construct validation
原典Chen, G., Bliese, P. D. & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology. Organizational Research Methods, 8(4), 375–409. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
別名cross-level construct validity, multilevel construct validation, MNV, nomological validity across levelsconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
関連44
概要Multilevel nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct and its network of theoretical relationships hold consistently across multiple levels of analysis — such as individual, team, and organization. It extends classical construct validation to nested data structures, ensuring that a measure means the same thing and behaves as theory predicts at each level.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multilevel nomological validity · Convergent Validity. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare