ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

階層的探索的因子分析 (ML-EFA)×二因子モデル(一般因子と特定因子)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年19941937
提唱者Bengt O. MuthénHolzinger & Swineford (1937); modern revival by Reise (2012)
種類Latent variable / multilevel dimension reductionConfirmatory latent variable model
原典Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3), 376–398. DOI ↗Reise, S. P. (2012). The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. DOI ↗
別名ML-EFA, multilevel factor analysis, two-level exploratory factor analysis, hierarchical exploratory factor analysisBifaktör Modeli — Genel ve Spesifik Faktörler, hierarchical factor model, general-specific factor model, Schmid-Leiman model
関連36
概要Multilevel exploratory factor analysis uncovers latent factor structures simultaneously at two or more levels of a data hierarchy — for example, both within individuals and between groups — without imposing a fixed structure in advance. It is essential whenever survey or test items are collected from respondents nested inside classrooms, organisations, or clinics.The bifactor measurement model specifies that every indicator loads simultaneously on a single general factor and on one of several specific (group) factors. Formally introduced by Holzinger and Swineford in 1937 and brought into mainstream psychometrics by Reise (2012), it is now the standard tool for evaluating whether a multidimensional scale can legitimately yield a single composite score.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multilevel EFA · Bifactor Model. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare