ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

多層判別妥当性×多層測定不変性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年20052000s
提唱者Dyer, Hanges, & Hall; Chen, Sousa, & WestMuthén, Asparouhov, and colleagues
種類Validity evaluation within multilevel CFAMeasurement model evaluation
原典Dyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J., & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. DOI ↗Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2009). Multilevel factor analysis of class and student achievement components. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34(2), 250–270. link ↗
別名multilevel DV, cross-level discriminant validity, hierarchical discriminant validity, ML-DVMLMI, multilevel factorial invariance, cross-level measurement invariance, multilevel CFA invariance
関連53
概要Multilevel discriminant validity evaluates whether theoretically distinct constructs are empirically separable when data are nested within higher-level units such as teams, schools, or organizations. It extends single-level discriminant validity checks into a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework, verifying that constructs are distinguishable both within and between levels simultaneously.Multilevel measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a latent construct is measured equivalently both within clusters (e.g., individuals within teams) and between clusters (e.g., team-level aggregates). It extends standard measurement invariance procedures to nested data structures commonly encountered in organisational, educational, and cross-cultural research.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multilevel Discriminant Validity · Multilevel Measurement Invariance. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare