ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

多層判別妥当性×多層収束的妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年20052005
提唱者Dyer, Hanges, & Hall; Chen, Sousa, & WestDyer, Hanges & Hall; Chen, Bliese & Mathieu
種類Validity evaluation within multilevel CFAMeasurement validity evaluation
原典Dyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J., & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. DOI ↗Dyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J. & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. DOI ↗
別名multilevel DV, cross-level discriminant validity, hierarchical discriminant validity, ML-DVcross-level convergent validity, multilevel measurement validity, between-level convergent validity
関連54
概要Multilevel discriminant validity evaluates whether theoretically distinct constructs are empirically separable when data are nested within higher-level units such as teams, schools, or organizations. It extends single-level discriminant validity checks into a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework, verifying that constructs are distinguishable both within and between levels simultaneously.Multilevel convergent validity evaluates whether items or scales intended to measure the same construct show coherent, strong associations at each level of a nested data structure — within individuals, within groups, and between groups. It extends classical convergent validity from single-level measurement models into the multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (ML-CFA) framework.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multilevel Discriminant Validity · Multilevel Convergent Validity. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare