ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

多層的コンテンツ妥当性×判別妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1975–2000s1959
提唱者Rooted in Lawshe (1975) for content validity; multilevel extension developed through multilevel psychometric literature from the 1990s onwardDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
種類Validity evaluation / expert judgmentValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
原典Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
別名hierarchical content validity, nested-data content validity, multilevel scale content evaluation, MCVdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
関連65
概要Multilevel content validity extends the classical content validity framework to settings where items, raters, or respondents are nested within hierarchical structures — such as students within schools, patients within clinics, or items rated by panels from distinct cultural or professional groups. It ensures that scale content is relevant and representative at every level of the hierarchy, not just in the aggregate.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multilevel Content Validity · Discriminant Validity. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare