手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 多群測定不変性検定× | 確認的因子分析(CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1971–1993 | 1969 |
| 提唱者≠ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1971); Meredith, W. (1993) | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| 種類≠ | Model comparison / hypothesis testing | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| 原典≠ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | measurement invariance, factorial invariance, cross-group invariance, MI testing | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Multi-group measurement invariance testing examines whether a latent construct is measured in the same way across two or more distinct groups — such as cultures, genders, or age cohorts. It is a prerequisite for meaningful group comparisons of latent means or relationships, ensuring that observed score differences reflect true differences rather than measurement artifacts. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|