ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

多群項目分析×項目応答理論における項目特性曲線(ICC)の差×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年19861970s–1993
提唱者Classical test theory tradition; systematised by Crocker & Algina (1986)William H. Angoff and colleagues (ETS); systematized by Holland & Wainer
種類Comparative item-level analysisItem-level bias detection
原典Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030616341Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805809589
別名MGIA, group-comparative item analysis, subgroup item analysis, cross-group item analysisDIF, item bias analysis, measurement non-equivalence, item-level measurement bias
関連65
概要Multi-group item analysis computes classical item statistics — difficulty, discrimination, and corrected item-total correlations — separately for each subgroup in a sample and then compares those statistics across groups. It is a standard diagnostic step in scale development and test fairness evaluation, revealing items that behave differently for men versus women, across age cohorts, or across cultural groups before more formal DIF testing.Differential item functioning identifies test or survey items that behave differently for examinees from different groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or language background — after controlling for the underlying ability or trait being measured. DIF analysis is essential for fairness evaluation in educational testing and psychological scale development.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multi-group item analysis · Differential Item Functioning. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare