ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

多群判別的妥当性評価×判別妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1981 (foundational criterion); multi-group extension 1990s–2000s1959
提唱者Fornell & Larcker (for the AVE-based criterion); extended to multi-group settings by the SEM invariance literatureDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
種類Validity assessment / model comparisonValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
原典Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
別名cross-group discriminant validity, multi-sample discriminant validity, MGDV, discriminant validity across groupsdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
関連55
概要Multi-group discriminant validity assessment tests whether constructs measured by a scale are empirically distinct not just in one sample but consistently across two or more groups (e.g., cultures, genders, age cohorts). It extends standard discriminant validity criteria — such as the AVE rule and the HTMT ratio — into a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework to verify that conceptual distinctness is replicable across subpopulations.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Multi-group discriminant validity · Discriminant Validity. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare