手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 多群判別的妥当性評価× | 判別妥当性× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1981 (foundational criterion); multi-group extension 1990s–2000s | 1959 |
| 提唱者≠ | Fornell & Larcker (for the AVE-based criterion); extended to multi-group settings by the SEM invariance literature | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| 種類≠ | Validity assessment / model comparison | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| 原典≠ | Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | cross-group discriminant validity, multi-sample discriminant validity, MGDV, discriminant validity across groups | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| 関連 | 5 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | Multi-group discriminant validity assessment tests whether constructs measured by a scale are empirically distinct not just in one sample but consistently across two or more groups (e.g., cultures, genders, age cohorts). It extends standard discriminant validity criteria — such as the AVE rule and the HTMT ratio — into a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework to verify that conceptual distinctness is replicable across subpopulations. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|