手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| マルチグループ収束的妥当性× | 多群測定不変性検定× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1981 / 2000 | 1971–1993 |
| 提唱者≠ | Fornell & Larcker (convergent validity criteria); Vandenberg & Lance (multi-group extension) | Jöreskog, K. G. (1971); Meredith, W. (1993) |
| 種類≠ | Validity assessment procedure | Model comparison / hypothesis testing |
| 原典≠ | Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | cross-group convergent validity, multi-sample convergent validity, MGCFA convergent validity, AVE across groups | measurement invariance, factorial invariance, cross-group invariance, MI testing |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Multi-group convergent validity examines whether items purported to measure the same latent construct relate strongly to that construct consistently across distinct subgroups such as demographic categories, cultures, or experimental conditions. It extends single-sample convergent validity checks into a comparative multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework. | Multi-group measurement invariance testing examines whether a latent construct is measured in the same way across two or more distinct groups — such as cultures, genders, or age cohorts. It is a prerequisite for meaningful group comparisons of latent means or relationships, ensuring that observed score differences reflect true differences rather than measurement artifacts. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|