手法を比較

	Multi-Criteria Site Selection	Public Participation GIS (PPGIS)
分野	Urban Studies	Urban Studies
系統	MCDM	Process / pipeline
提唱年	2006	2006
提唱者	Jacek Malczewski (GIS-MCDA synthesis); Thomas Saaty (AHP weighting)	Renee Sieber (synthesizing 1990s NCGIA work)
種類	Spatial multi-criteria decision analysis for siting facilities or land uses	Participatory integration of local spatial knowledge into GIS
原典	Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 703–726.	Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507.
別名	GIS-MCDA, Weighted Overlay Suitability, AHP Site Suitability, Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation	PPGIS, Participatory GIS, PGIS, Volunteered Geographic Mapping
関連	4	4
概要	Multi-criteria site selection combines multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) with geographic information systems to choose where to locate a facility or land use when many, often conflicting, spatial criteria matter at once. Synthesized as GIS-based MCDA by Jacek Malczewski, it standardizes each criterion layer to a common scale, assigns the criteria importance weights — frequently via Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process — and combines them through weighted overlay to produce a suitability surface that ranks every candidate location. The method makes an inherently messy, value-laden siting decision explicit, reproducible, and auditable.	Public participation GIS (PPGIS) is a family of practices that bring the spatial knowledge, values, and priorities of ordinary people into geographic information systems, so that community perspectives sit alongside expert and official data in planning and decision-making. Synthesized as a field by Renee Sieber in 2006, it ranges from facilitated workshops where residents mark up paper maps to web mapping platforms where thousands of people drop points marking places they value or fear. Its aim is both technical and political: to enrich spatial analysis with local knowledge and to widen who gets to shape decisions about place.