手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 混合研究におけるメタ推論× | 変容的混合研究法デザイン× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 研究デザイン | 研究デザイン |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1998–2003 | 2003–2009 |
| 提唱者≠ | Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| 種類≠ | Mixed methods integration procedure | Mixed methods research design |
| 原典≠ | Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| 別名 | meta-inference, mixed methods overall inference, integrated inference, MMR meta-inference | transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Mixed methods meta-inference is the overarching conclusion drawn at the end of a mixed methods study by systematically combining and integrating the separate inferences produced by the quantitative and qualitative strands. It represents the highest-level interpretive act in mixed methods research: moving beyond strand-specific findings to produce a unified, coherent understanding of the research problem that neither strand could yield alone. | Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|