ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

メタエスノグラフィー×Grounded Theory×
分野科学計量学質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19881967
提唱者George W. Noblit and R. Dwight HareBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
種類Qualitative evidence synthesis methodMethod
原典Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930780Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
別名qualitative meta-synthesis, interpretive synthesis, ethnographic synthesis, meta-ethnographic reviewGT, Grounded Theory Approach
関連43
概要Meta-ethnography is a systematic method for synthesising findings across multiple qualitative studies by comparing and translating the conceptual frameworks and metaphors each study uses. Developed by Noblit and Hare in 1988, it produces a new interpretive account that goes beyond any single study, preserving the richness of qualitative data while generating broader theoretical insights. It is the most influential approach to qualitative evidence synthesis in health, social, and educational research.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Meta-ethnography · Grounded Theory. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare