手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| Meltzer-Richard Model× | Spatial Voting Model× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | Political Economy | Political Science |
| 系統 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 提唱年≠ | 1981 | 1957 |
| 提唱者≠ | Allan Meltzer & Scott Richard | Harold Hotelling, Duncan Black & Anthony Downs |
| 種類≠ | Formal model of redistribution and government size | Formal model of electoral and legislative choice |
| 原典≠ | Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914-927. DOI ↗ | Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper & Row. ISBN: 9780060417505 |
| 別名 | Meltzer-Richard Hypothesis, Rational Theory of Government Size, Median Voter Theory of Redistribution, MR Model | Spatial Theory of Voting, Downsian Model, Proximity Voting Model, Median Voter Model |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | The Meltzer-Richard model is the canonical political-economy theory of the size of government, developed by Allan Meltzer and Scott Richard in 1981. It embeds the median voter theorem in a fiscal setting: the decisive median voter chooses a single linear (proportional) income tax rate whose revenue funds a uniform lump-sum transfer to everyone. Because income distributions are right-skewed, the median income falls below the mean, so the median voter is a net beneficiary of redistribution and votes for a positive tax. The model's central prediction is that the size of government rises with the ratio of mean to median income — and therefore with inequality — and with any extension of the franchise that lowers the decisive voter's relative income. | The spatial voting model represents voters and political alternatives as points in a common geometric policy space and assumes that each voter supports the alternative nearest to their own ideal point. Rooted in Hotelling's location theory, Duncan Black's 1948 single-peakedness result, and Anthony Downs's 1957 economic theory of democracy, the model yields two foundational results: the median voter theorem, which identifies the equilibrium policy in one dimension, and the Downsian prediction that two vote-seeking parties converge toward the center. It is the workhorse formalism behind modern empirical estimation of political positions. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|