ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

マッチド診断精度研究×横断疫学研究×
分野疫学疫学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1990s–2000s (formalised with STARD 2003)1960s (formal codification); widely practiced since mid-20th century
提唱者Evolved from matched case-control methodology; STARD standards formalised by Bossuyt et al. (2003)Classical epidemiology tradition; systematized by Brian MacMahon and Thomas Pugh (1960s)
種類Diagnostic / clinical epidemiology study designObservational, descriptive/analytic epidemiological design
原典Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. BMJ, 326(7379), 41–44. DOI ↗Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195080407
別名matched DAS, paired diagnostic accuracy study, matched test accuracy study, matched sensitivity-specificity studyprevalence study, cross-sectional survey, transversal study, cross-sectional design
関連46
概要A matched diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well an index test correctly identifies a target condition in study participants who have been matched on key characteristics — such as age, sex, or disease severity — to control for confounding. By pairing diseased and non-diseased subjects on relevant factors before administering the test, the design isolates the test's own discriminative performance from variation attributable to imbalanced covariates, yielding cleaner estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and related accuracy measures.A cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest simultaneously in a defined population at a single point in time (or over a short period). Because there is no follow-up, it is the most efficient observational design for estimating disease prevalence and for generating hypotheses about associations between risk factors and health outcomes.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Matched Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Cross-sectional epidemiological study. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare