ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

機械学習拡張プロペンシティスコアマッチング×粗化完全マッチング(CEM)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年20042011-2012
提唱者McCaffrey, Ridgeway & Morral (2004); Westreich, Lessler & Funk (2010)Iacus, King, & Porro
種類Causal inference / matchingMatching / causal inference
原典McCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 403-425. DOI ↗Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗
別名ML-PSM, boosted propensity score matching, ML-augmented PSM, nonparametric propensity score matchingCEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching
関連66
概要Machine learning-augmented propensity score matching (ML-PSM) replaces the traditional logistic regression used to estimate propensity scores with flexible machine learning algorithms — such as gradient boosted trees, random forests, or LASSO — to better capture complex, nonlinear relationships among covariates. The resulting richer propensity scores improve covariate balance and reduce bias in the estimated average treatment effect on the treated (ATT).Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Machine Learning-Augmented Propensity Score Matching · Coarsened Exact Matching. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare