ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

機械学習拡張マッチング推定量×マッチング推定量×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年2006–20181973
提唱者Abadie & Imbens (classical matching); Chernozhukov et al. (ML augmentation framework)Rubin (1973); large-sample theory by Abadie & Imbens (2006)
種類Causal inference / nonparametric matchingNonparametric matching / causal inference
原典Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1-C68. DOI ↗Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235-267. DOI ↗
別名ML-augmented matching, ML matching estimator, high-dimensional matching estimator, data-adaptive matching estimatornearest-neighbor matching, NNM, matching on covariates, covariate matching
関連56
概要The machine learning-augmented matching estimator combines classical nearest-neighbor or propensity-score matching with ML algorithms — such as lasso, random forests, or gradient boosting — to select covariates, estimate propensity scores, and correct for residual bias. The result is a matching-based causal estimator that remains valid under high-dimensional confounding where traditional hand-specified matching fails.The matching estimator identifies the causal effect of a treatment by pairing each treated unit with one or more untreated units that have similar observed characteristics. Formalised by Rubin (1973) and given rigorous large-sample theory by Abadie and Imbens (2006), it constructs a credible control group from observational data without requiring a parametric model for the outcome.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Machine Learning-Augmented Matching Estimator · Matching Estimator. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare