ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

機械学習拡張イベントスタディデザイン×動的差分の差分法×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年2010s–2020s2021
提唱者Chernozhukov et al. (double/debiased ML foundation); applied to event studies in subsequent econometrics literatureCallaway & Sant'Anna; Sun & Abraham
種類Quasi-experimental / causal inferenceCausal inference / quasi-experimental
原典Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1-C68. DOI ↗Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230. DOI ↗
別名ML-augmented event study, high-dimensional event study, DML event study, causal ML event studyDynamic DiD, Staggered DiD, Event-time DiD, Heterogeneous-timing DiD
関連34
概要Machine learning-augmented event study design combines the standard event study framework — which traces outcome dynamics around a treatment date — with ML-based methods such as double/debiased machine learning (DML) or regularized regression to handle high-dimensional covariates, improve confounder control, and produce valid causal estimates when the covariate space is too large for conventional regression to manage reliably.Dynamic Difference-in-Differences extends the classic DiD framework to settings where units adopt treatment at different times. Rather than collapsing all variation into a single 2x2 comparison, it estimates group-time average treatment effects for each adoption cohort at each calendar period, then aggregates them into interpretable summaries of the causal effect over event time.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Machine learning-augmented event study design · Dynamic Difference-in-Differences. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare