ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

機械学習拡張型粗視化完全一致法(ML-CEM)×二重に頑健な推定量(AIPW)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年2012-20192005
提唱者Extension of Iacus, King & Porro (2012) CEM; ML integration developed in subsequent causal ML literatureRobins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins
種類Matching / quasi-experimentalSemiparametric causal estimator
原典Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129. DOI ↗
別名ML-augmented CEM, ML-CEM, automated coarsened exact matching, ML-assisted CEMAIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)
関連65
概要Machine Learning-Augmented Coarsened Exact Matching extends Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012) by using supervised machine learning to automate and optimise the coarsening step — the discretisation of continuous covariates into bins — rather than relying on researcher-specified cutpoints. This reduces both ad hoc subjectivity in coarsening decisions and residual imbalance, while preserving CEM's core logic of exact matching within coarsened strata.Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Machine Learning-Augmented Coarsened Exact Matching · Doubly Robust Estimation. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare