ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

縦断的法則的妥当性×判別妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s1959
提唱者Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onwardDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
種類Validity evaluationValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
原典Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
別名longitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validitydiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
関連65
概要Longitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Longitudinal Nomological Validity · Discriminant Validity. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare