ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

縦断的項目分析×確認的因子分析(CFA)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1990s–2000s1969
提唱者Vandenberg, Lance, Meade and colleagues in organizational/educational measurementKarl Gustav Jöreskog
種類Item-level longitudinal diagnosticHypothesis-testing latent variable model
原典Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C. & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
別名LIA, repeated-measures item analysis, longitudinal item calibration, item parameter stability analysisCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
関連64
概要Longitudinal item analysis examines how the statistical properties of individual scale items — difficulty, discrimination, factor loadings, and fit — remain stable or change systematically across repeated measurement occasions. It is the item-level foundation of longitudinal measurement validity.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Longitudinal Item Analysis · Confirmatory factor analysis. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare