手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| Longitudinal Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (L-IPA)(縦断的解釈現象学分析)× | Thematic Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 質的手法 | 質的研究 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2000s–2010s (IPA from mid-1990s; longitudinal variant formalised ~2009–2014) | 2006 |
| 提唱者≠ | Jonathan A. Smith and colleagues; longitudinal extension developed by Smith, Flowers, and Larkin | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative research design and analysis approach | Method |
| 原典≠ | Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | L-IPA, longitudinal IPA, repeated-interview IPA, temporal IPA | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| 関連≠ | 4 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Longitudinal Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (L-IPA) extends the IPA tradition by interviewing the same participants at multiple time points, allowing researchers to trace how the meaning of a lived experience evolves over time. Grounded in phenomenology and hermeneutics, L-IPA preserves idiographic depth at each wave while adding a temporal dimension that cross-sectional IPA cannot provide. It is used widely in health psychology, illness adjustment studies, and any domain where experience unfolds across a significant time span. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|