ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

縦断的判別妥当性×収束的妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1993–20001959
提唱者Formalized through SEM-based validity traditions (Campbell & Fiske, 1959; Cole & Maxwell, 1993)Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
種類Validity assessment / measurement qualityValidity evidence / construct validation
原典Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (1993). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
別名LDV, longitudinal construct distinctiveness, cross-time discriminant validity, temporal discriminant validityconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
関連44
概要Longitudinal discriminant validity tests whether a psychological construct measured at two or more time points is empirically distinct across occasions — ensuring that the same construct does not collapse into a single undifferentiated mass over time. It is a prerequisite for meaningful change modeling in panel and longitudinal research.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Longitudinal Discriminant Validity · Convergent Validity. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare