ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

縦断的判別妥当性×確認的因子分析(CFA)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1993–20001969
提唱者Formalized through SEM-based validity traditions (Campbell & Fiske, 1959; Cole & Maxwell, 1993)Karl Gustav Jöreskog
種類Validity assessment / measurement qualityHypothesis-testing latent variable model
原典Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (1993). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
別名LDV, longitudinal construct distinctiveness, cross-time discriminant validity, temporal discriminant validityCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
関連44
概要Longitudinal discriminant validity tests whether a psychological construct measured at two or more time points is empirically distinct across occasions — ensuring that the same construct does not collapse into a single undifferentiated mass over time. It is a prerequisite for meaningful change modeling in panel and longitudinal research.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Longitudinal Discriminant Validity · Confirmatory factor analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare