ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Longitudinal Discourse Analysis×Thematic Analysis×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1990s–2000s (systematised as a distinct approach)2006
提唱者Norman Fairclough; Jan Blommaert; applied linguists in sociolinguistics and CDA traditionsVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
種類Qualitative longitudinal research designMethod
原典Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge. ISBN: 978-0415258937Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
別名LDA, diachronic discourse analysis, longitudinal CDA, discourse change analysisTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
関連63
概要Longitudinal Discourse Analysis (LDA) is a qualitative research approach that examines how discourse — language in use, texts, talk, and representational practices — changes across time. Rather than analysing a single snapshot of language, LDA collects and compares discourse data at multiple points to uncover how meanings, identities, ideologies, or social practices evolve, stabilise, or shift under the influence of historical, institutional, or societal forces.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Longitudinal Discourse Analysis · Thematic Analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare