ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

縦断的構成概念妥当性×再検査信頼性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1993–20001904
提唱者Meredith, Vandenberg, and the measurement invariance traditionKarl Pearson
種類Validity evaluation frameworkReliability estimate
原典Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0070478497
別名longitudinal measurement validity, construct validity over time, longitudinal measurement invariance, LCVstability reliability, temporal stability, repeatability coefficient, TRT reliability
関連54
概要Longitudinal construct validity evaluates whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across multiple time points. It is tested by progressively constraining a confirmatory factor model across waves and comparing model fit, ensuring that observed change scores reflect genuine change in the underlying trait rather than measurement drift.Test-retest reliability quantifies the temporal consistency of a measure by correlating scores obtained from the same participants on two separate occasions. It is a cornerstone of psychometric validation, directly indicating whether a scale or instrument yields stable scores when the underlying construct has not changed.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Longitudinal Construct Validity · Test-Retest Reliability. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare