手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 縦断的構成概念妥当性× | 測定不変性テスト× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1993–2000 | 2000 |
| 提唱者≠ | Meredith, Vandenberg, and the measurement invariance tradition | Vandenberg & Lance |
| 種類≠ | Validity evaluation framework | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis procedure |
| 原典≠ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ | Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | longitudinal measurement validity, construct validity over time, longitudinal measurement invariance, LCV | Factorial Invariance, Measurement Equivalence, Configural-Metric-Scalar Testing, Ölçüm Değişmezliği |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Longitudinal construct validity evaluates whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across multiple time points. It is tested by progressively constraining a confirmatory factor model across waves and comparing model fit, ensuring that observed change scores reflect genuine change in the underlying trait rather than measurement drift. | Measurement invariance testing is a sequence of nested confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models that examines whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across distinct groups or time points. Systematized and popularized by Vandenberg and Lance (2000), the procedure tests a hierarchy of constraints — from identical factor patterns to identical item intercepts — so that researchers can justify meaningful group comparisons on latent means. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|