手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 縦断的構成概念妥当性× | 因子分析(EFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 心理測定学 | 統計学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1993–2000 | — |
| 提唱者≠ | Meredith, Vandenberg, and the measurement invariance tradition | — |
| 種類≠ | Validity evaluation framework | Latent variable / dimension reduction |
| 原典≠ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ | Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | longitudinal measurement validity, construct validity over time, longitudinal measurement invariance, LCV | common factor analysis, açımlayıcı faktör analizi, factor analysis |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Longitudinal construct validity evaluates whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across multiple time points. It is tested by progressively constraining a confirmatory factor model across waves and comparing model fit, ensuring that observed change scores reflect genuine change in the underlying trait rather than measurement drift. | Exploratory factor analysis reduces a large set of observed variables into a smaller number of latent common factors. It is widely used in scale development and psychometrics to uncover the dimensional structure that underlies a set of correlated items, without specifying that structure in advance. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|