ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

基準重要度の対数分解×組み合わせ距離に基づく評価×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20242016
提唱者Pala, O.Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.
種類Objective weighting via logarithmic decompositionDistance from anti-ideal (Euclidean + Taxicab)
原典Pala, O. (2024). Assessment of the social progress on European Union by logarithmic decomposition of criteria importance. Expert Systems With Applications DOI ↗Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. (2016). A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research link ↗
別名
関連88
概要LODECI (LOgarithmic DEcomposition of Criteria Importance) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pala, O. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CODAS (Combinative Distance-Based Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: LODECI · CODAS. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare