ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

線形最大正規化×複合比例評価法×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年19671996
提唱者Fishburn, P. C.Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.
種類Normalization (linear-max, ratio-based)Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)
原典Fishburn, P. C. (1967). Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Sets: Application to Priorities and Assignments. Operations Research DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗
別名
関連48
概要LINEAR-MAX-NORMALIZATION (Linear Max Normalization — division by column maximum (benefit) or column minimum over value (cost)) is a normalization multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Fishburn, P. C. in 1967. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: LINEAR-MAX-NORMALIZATION · COPRAS. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare